Insights
Operator BriefsPublished 2026-08-065 min read

ConocoPhillips Q2 2026: Bakken Production, Permits & Spuds

ConocoPhillips and Burlington research with corrected North Dakota date interpretation: well-status dates do not establish permit issuance.

By Johnathan · Reviewed by EnergyNetWatch Research · Historical report · Content updated 2026-09-12

Historical report

This page is a historical source-record snapshot tied to a specific company update or activity event. It links back into durable operator and state workflows.

Operator hub

Key Takeaways

  • North Dakota well-status dates do not establish new permit issuance; earlier permit counts are withdrawn.
  • Burlington and ConocoPhillips source-filed labels should remain visible before any company rollup.
  • Company production, historical reported spuds and well-status dates answer separate questions.

Correction — September 12, 2026: The earlier North Dakota counts of 113 and 389 are withdrawn as permit-issuance counts. The well-index feed stores a well-status date in issue_date, not verified permit issuance. The historical cohorts have not been reconstructed as issued permits. This correction preserves the Q2 reporting period and does not refresh company figures or reported-spud data.

ConocoPhillips reported second-quarter 2026 results on August 6, 2026. EnergyNetWatch separately reviewed North Dakota well-index and reported-spud records under ConocoPhillips-, Burlington-, and related source labels.

The company figures below are from ConocoPhillips. The North Dakota rows are a separate EnergyNetWatch source-record layer.

For the current operator view, use the durable ConocoPhillips & Burlington operator intelligence page. This page preserves the Q2 event and the current North Dakota record check.

Q2 company update

Reported itemQ2 2026
Total production2,248 thousand Boe per day
Lower 48 production1,479 thousand Boe per day
Delaware Basin production720 thousand Boe per day
Midland Basin production202 thousand Boe per day
Eagle Ford production363 thousand Boe per day
Bakken production189 thousand Boe per day
Cash provided by operating activities$7.4 billion
Cash from operations, excluding working capital$7.2 billion
Shareholder distributions$3.0 billion

ConocoPhillips also reported that it sold noncore Lower 48 assets for $1.7 billion, with the transaction closing in July. The company said full-year guidance was unchanged.

North Dakota source-record check

EnergyNetWatch record layerCurrent matched pull
90-day permit-issuance countWithdrawn; status-date basis
12-month permit-issuance countWithdrawn; status-date basis
90-day reported spuds13
12-month reported spuds63
Historical well-index source clockThrough August 5, 2026; not a permit-issuance date

The North Dakota pull includes Burlington Resources and ConocoPhillips-linked source labels. Burlington is kept visible because the state record may use an operating or subsidiary label instead of the parent-company name.

Q1 to Q2 production comparison

Company-reported itemQ1 2026Q2 2026Change
Total production2,309 Mboe/d2,248 Mboe/d-61 Mboe/d (-2.6%)
Lower 48 production1,453 Mboe/d1,479 Mboe/d+26 Mboe/d (+1.8%)
Delaware Basin698 Mboe/d720 Mboe/d+22 Mboe/d (+3.2%)
Midland Basin200 Mboe/d202 Mboe/d+2 Mboe/d (+1.0%)
Eagle Ford367 Mboe/d363 Mboe/d-4 Mboe/d (-1.1%)
Bakken183 Mboe/d189 Mboe/d+6 Mboe/d (+3.3%)

ConocoPhillips attributed the corporate production change to factors including Qatar disruption and higher Surmont royalties. The company-level change should not be treated as a direct explanation for any individual North Dakota permit or reported-spud row.

What the records show

The historical North Dakota pull contains well-index and reported-spud rows under Burlington and ConocoPhillips-related labels. Neither this review nor the earlier Q1 count establishes permit issuance or permit growth. A verified issuance source is required before making that comparison.

How to read the comparison

The company release reports production and cash flow across the company. The North Dakota table preserves the historical reported-spud counts and withdraws the permit interpretation. The layers should not be added together or treated as a consolidated company reconciliation.

The table does not rank current permitting activity or establish a direct connection between a source row and the company's Q2 production, a specific facility, or a vendor award.

Sources

EnergyNetWatch North Dakota records were reviewed August 8, 2026; their permit-date interpretation was corrected September 12. Well-status dates, reported spuds and company production use different source bases and time windows.

Data notes

Permit interpretation corrected September 12, 2026 using retained ND well-index evidence. Historical issuance cohorts were not reconstructed. Original company and reported-spud snapshots retain their stated periods; this is not a data refresh.

Recommended next pages

Related EnergyNetWatch pages

operator-intelligenceoperator-analysisearnings

Want the current table behind this analysis?

Public articles use selected examples. Request access if your team needs current source refreshes, exact identifiers, maps, exports, alerts, saved workflows, or API access for this market.