Occidental Operator Intelligence: TX/NM Permits, Production & Source Labels
Track Occidental operator activity across OXY, Anadarko-linked, OXYROCK, Texas, and New Mexico source records with permits, spuds, production windows, and label caveats.
By Johnathan · Reviewed by EnergyNetWatch Research · Last updated 2026-06-29
Living operator brief
This page is maintained as an operator intelligence brief, with refreshed permits, spuds, production windows, counties, source labels, and watch items where available.
Key Takeaways
- Reviewed OXY-family TX/NM labels show 167 combined trailing 90-day permits and 6 trailing 90-day reported spuds.
- OXY, Occidental, Anadarko-linked, and OXYROCK labels should stay visible before a user creates an account or county follow-up list.
- The durable operator page links to the Q1 2026 event brief instead of replacing it.
EnergyNetWatch tracks Occidental through public source records that do not always use one clean parent-company name.
The current public signal is a Permian operator-identity screen: reviewed OXY-family Texas and New Mexico records showed 167 combined trailing-90-day permits, 572 combined trailing-12-month permits, and 6 combined trailing-90-day reported spuds across supported source labels.
Key Takeaways
| Signal | Current public read |
|---|---|
| Parent company | Occidental Petroleum |
| Main source-label issue | OXY, Occidental, Anadarko-linked, OXYROCK, and related filed labels |
| Main state focus | Texas and New Mexico |
| Current permit signal | 167 combined trailing-90-day permits in the reviewed TX/NM set |
| Current spud signal | 6 combined trailing-90-day reported spuds in the reviewed TX/NM set |
| First request | Current OXY-family source-label activity table |
Current Operator Signal
The main issue is not whether Occidental has Permian scale. The issue is which filed operator labels should be kept visible before a user ranks counties, permits, spuds, production windows, or account follow-up.
Occidental reports at the company level. State records can preserve legal, acquired, subsidiary, or legacy labels. That means an OXY account screen should not force every row into one total, but it also should not ignore Anadarko-linked or OXYROCK rows where source evidence supports the review.
Source Labels Reviewed
| Source-label group | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| OXY USA | Current OXY-family activity can appear under this label. |
| Occidental Permian | Permian rows may preserve a more specific operating label. |
| Anadarko-linked labels | Acquired labels can remain relevant in state records. |
| OXYROCK / CrownRock-related labels | Acquisition-cycle records need explicit identity review. |
| OXY WTP / related labels | Some rows require asset and entity review before use in a parent-company table. |
State And County Activity
The current public screen is weighted toward Texas and New Mexico. Texas showed the broader permit layer in the reviewed pull, while New Mexico carried a narrower current label set.
For a commercial team, the first action is not a broad company profile. It is a county and source-label table: operator label, state, county, issue date, reported-spud follow-through, source date, and map context.
Permit And Spud Signal
| Field | Current public signal |
|---|---|
| Combined TX/NM 90D permits | 167 |
| Combined TX/NM 12M permits | 572 |
| Combined TX/NM 90D reported spuds | 6 |
Permits show filed activity. Reported spuds show drilling-start evidence where the source reports it. Production windows answer a different question and should stay separate.
What To Monitor Next
- Texas OXY-family permits after the latest reviewed May records.
- New Mexico OXY activity after the latest reviewed April records.
- Anadarko-linked spud follow-through.
- OXYROCK and CrownRock-related source-label rows.
- Facility, T-4, and infrastructure records near active counties.
What To Request
Request the current OXY-family source-label activity table with permits, reported spuds, production month, counties, source dates, map links, exports, alerts, and API fields.
Related EnergyNetWatch Pages
- Occidental Q1 2026 Permian Signals
- Texas drilling permits by operator
- New Mexico drilling permits by operator
- Operator activity chase lists
- Oil and gas data API
Sources And Data Notes
This durable operator page summarizes the current public EnergyNetWatch OXY-family source-record screen. Company-reported production and state-source permit/spud records answer different questions. Permit counts are activity screens by operator label, state, county, and issue date; they are not company-reported production totals.
Data notes
This durable operator page summarizes reviewed EnergyNetWatch public source-record screens for OXY-family Texas and New Mexico labels. Permit and spud records are source-label activity screens, not company-reported production totals.
Recommended next pages
Occidental Q1 2026 Permian Signals: Texas & New Mexico Activity
Review Occidental’s Q1 2026 Permian activity signals using Texas and New Mexico state-source records, permits, production context, and operator evidence.
Texas Drilling Permits by Operator: May 2026 Permit and Spud Activity Snapshot
Texas operators ranked by trailing 90-day drilling permits, with recent reported spuds and source freshness notes from EnergyNetWatch.
New Mexico Drilling Activity Snapshot: Permits and Reported Spuds by Operator
New Mexico operators ranked by trailing 90-day permit records and independent reported spud records from EnergyNetWatch app data.
Operator Activity Chase Lists: Turning Public Oil And Gas Records Into Account Workflows (2026)
Build operator activity chase lists from oil and gas permits, spuds, completions, source dates, and account-ready EnergyNetWatch records.
Related EnergyNetWatch pages
Want the current table behind this analysis?
Public articles use selected examples. Request access if your team needs current source refreshes, exact identifiers, maps, exports, alerts, saved workflows, or API access for this market.