Ovintiv Q2 2026: Permian Permits, Spuds & the Anadarko Sale

Ovintiv reported Q2 average production of 614.6 MBOE/d. Permian production averaged 231 MBOE/d, and the company turned 38 net Permian wells to sales during the quarter. Ovintiv also reported approximately $2.82 billion of cash proceeds from the sale of its Anadarko assets.

The transaction covered Ovintiv's Anadarko assets in Oklahoma. In the same announcement, Ovintiv described the Permian and Montney as its core plays. The current Texas records therefore provide a public-record view of the Permian operating footprint after that portfolio shift; the filed label alone is not a legal ownership determination. The pull also shows an older New Mexico label with no current permit or spud activity.

For the recurring operator view, use the Ovintiv Permian infrastructure and permit brief. This page preserves the Q2 event and the current Texas record comparison.

Q2 company figures

The company release describes the Oklahoma sale and the retained Permian operating plan. The state records below show the current Texas label, counties, permit window, production month, and direct facility rows.

Current EnergyNetWatch permit check

The current Texas permit layer is therefore the active state-record layer in this pull. The current Texas matched reported-spud signal shows 0 rows in 90 days and 10 in 12 months, with the latest matched signal on February 23, 2026. That is older than the current permit clock.

For a current operator view, the app keeps Ovintiv USA records separate from the older New Mexico label and shows the permit, reported-spud, production-month, county, and facility dates together. The source date remains visible on each layer.

Texas counties

The current validated county rows are concentrated in Martin, Andrews, and Midland. Raw rows with conflicting county codes and names are excluded from the public table until the join is corrected.

Production-month context

The current production rollup has May 2026 as the latest complete month for the primary numbered rows.

The New Mexico row is retained for historical scope but has no current permit or spud activity in this pull. These state well counts are not a substitute for the company's reported production figures.

Direct Texas facilities

The current facility layer contains explicit OVINTIV USA INC rows in Martin, Howard, Andrews, Midland, Glasscock, and other counties. Representative groups include 162 OTHER and 143 TANK_BATTERY records in Martin, 72 TANK_BATTERY records in Howard, and 49 OTHER records in Andrews. Several Martin OTHER rows have a latest first-seen date of June 19, 2026.

These rows are useful for locating the direct facility layer in the post-sale Permian footprint, but they do not prove that a facility was retained, expanded, connected to a particular well, or associated with a contract. The public page should show the source label and dates, not make an ownership claim that the record does not make.

What the records show

Ovintiv's Q2 release provides the corporate transaction and retained Permian production. The Anadarko divestiture covered Oklahoma assets, while the company continues to identify the Permian as a core play. The current state records show a live Texas permit layer under Ovintiv USA, a concentrated county footprint in Martin, Andrews, and Midland, and a facility layer that remains visible under the direct operating label. New Mexico has an older operator row but no current permit or spud activity in the current pull.

The Texas permit layer contains 32 rows in the current 90-day window, while the matched Texas reported-spud layer contains 0 rows in that window and 10 in 12 months. The latest Texas permit is August 4; the latest matched spud is February 23. The dates should be read as separate source clocks, not as a conclusion about field activity.

The different clocks matter. A current permit row does not establish a current spud, and the absence of a recent matched spud in the signal table does not establish that no field activity occurred. The page should present the two layers side by side and let the dates carry the distinction.

What to watch next

• Whether current Texas permits continue under OVINTIV USA INC. after August 4.
• Whether new reported-spud rows appear after February 23 in the matched Texas signal table.
• Whether Martin, Andrews, and Midland continue to carry the current permit rows.
• Whether direct facility rows receive newer source dates in the post-sale Permian footprint.
• Whether newer Texas records continue under OVINTIV USA INC. as the retained Permian activity develops.

How to read the comparison

The company table reports Ovintiv's Q2 production, Permian activity, guidance, and Anadarko transaction. Ovintiv's company release places the divested Anadarko assets in Oklahoma and identifies the Permian as a core play. The Texas and New Mexico tables report public state records under specific operator labels; they add current Permian record context but do not independently prove legal ownership or an asset boundary.

Sources and definitions

Company figures come from Ovintiv's Q2 2026 results. Texas records are based on the Texas Railroad Commission public data sets. New Mexico records are based on New Mexico Oil Conservation Division source records.

Permits, reported spuds, production records, and facility records are separate layers. A permit is not a spud, a spud is not a completion, and a facility row is not proof of a contract, ownership, or in-service status.

For current operator records, aliases, permits, wells, production histories, infrastructure records, exports, alerts, and API access, request EnergyNetWatch access.

What to request

The next useful table is an Ovintiv post-sale activity view with the current Texas operator label, county rows, permit and reported-spud dates, and direct facility records. Add the historical New Mexico label only as a separate reference row.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the Texas records show after Ovintiv's portfolio shift?

They show a current permit layer under OVINTIV USA INC. with 32 permits in the 90-day window and validated rows in Martin, Andrews, and Midland. That is a public-record view of Permian activity after the Oklahoma Anadarko divestiture; the state row itself does not establish legal ownership.

Why are there no 90-day matched spud rows?

The current matched signal table has no rows in that window and 10 in 12 months, with the latest matched signal on February 23. That is a record-timing result, not proof that no field activity occurred.

What does the facility table add?

It shows direct source-filed facility categories and counties under Ovintiv USA. It does not prove that a facility was retained, expanded, connected to a well, or tied to a contract.