Signal reports
Texas power and AI infrastructure signal report

Texas Data Center and Large Load Power Signal Report

PUCT, ERCOT, and Red Oak public records organized into a company, utility, process-timing, and local-evidence screen for Texas large-load and data-center infrastructure follow-up.

Public-record rows
505

PUCT, ERCOT, and Red Oak source rows

Signal-relevant rows
264

large-load, data-center, utility, or local relevance

Grouped lead rows
100

de-duplicated lead-export rows

Red Oak agenda rows
70

loaded local agenda evidence

What this report answers

Which Texas public records point to large-load, data-center, power, utility, local-agenda, or follow-up infrastructure signals?

Source clock

PUCT, ERCOT, and Red Oak records are loaded as a signal baseline; TCEQ, water, utility, substation, and site-plan layers remain follow-up checks.

Built for

Utility and power-contractor account screening
Substation, electrical, SCADA, and controls provider follow-up
Gas, water, civil, and site-support infrastructure research
Data-center vendor, economic-development, and site-selection research

Source layers

PUCT controls and filings
ERCOT large-load process materials
Red Oak local agenda records
Company, utility, jurisdiction, and process-timing screens
TCEQ, water, utility, substation, and site-plan follow-up checks

Sample rows

Selected records from the report workflow.

These examples show the format and evidence discipline. The current report includes the working table, CSV fields, and source-date context.

RecordGoogle / Lancium
SignalNamed company signal in PUCT large-load/data-center context
SourcePUCT source controls
Next checkLocal agenda, ERCOT, TCEQ, utility, water, and site evidence
RecordCROIDC / Red Oak high-tech industrial park
SignalApproximately 828.8 acres with parcel IDs in public agenda record
SourceRed Oak agenda item, May 11, 2026
Next checkFollow-on ordinance, utility service, water, TCEQ, and tenant/project evidence
RecordERCOT Batch Zero process window
SignalJuly/August 2026 process timing and Fall 2027 transmission-planning window
SourceERCOT large-load integration materials
Next checkForms, classification notices, TSP/DSP activity, and later filings

Fields included in the report / CSV

The public page shows selected rows. The requested report and CSV include the sortable fields needed for account, county, project, source-date, and follow-up review.

Company or account signalSource ownerJurisdiction or utility contextRecord typeSource dateLarge-load or data-center relevanceLocal agenda evidenceFollow-up source neededNext checkCaveat

What the source supports

A company, utility, jurisdiction, and process-timing screen for large-load and data-center infrastructure research.

A lead-export table that separates source/process owners from commercial account candidates.

A repeatable monitoring path for PUCT controls, ERCOT process materials, local agendas, and later TCEQ/water/utility evidence.

What the source does not prove

Construction starts, project spend, vendor need, energization date, final interconnection approval, exact load size, or contract award.

That every named company is the right buying account without direct project and stakeholder confirmation.

That TCEQ, water, utility, substation, and site-plan evidence is complete; those layers remain follow-up checks.

Report package

Executive signal sample
Grouped lead-export table
PUCT control filters
ERCOT process monitor
Local-agenda follow-up list

Request current rows

Request the Texas data center and large load power signal report.

Tell us the buyer segment, territory, and export format you need. We will scope the current report, companion CSV, app workspace, and any API/custom delivery path.

Request report