Insights
Infrastructure & MidstreamPublished 2026-06-2110 min read

Texas T-4 Pipeline Permit Watchlist: RRC Routes, Counties & Operators

Track Texas RRC T-4 pipeline permit rows by operator, county, commodity, source clock, route evidence, and current table availability.

By Johnathan · Reviewed by EnergyNetWatch Research · Maintained page · Content updated 2026-08-31

Recurring watchlist

This page is part of the recurring EnergyNetWatch signal library. Durable watchlist pages are refreshed as source records change.

State watchlists

Key Takeaways

  • The statewide permit-list clock and county GIS refresh clock are separate and should not be presented as one statewide update.
  • The August 21 statewide PDF contains 61 physical rows and 60 unique identifiers after counting the duplicate 10744 row once; the unique set includes 47 gas and 13 liquid records through 10798.
  • The July 27 GIS review found eight exact T-4 identifiers across Austin, Chambers, Lee, Reeves, and Upton above the older PDF sequence; those identifiers appear in the August 21 statewide PDF as well.
  • GIS presence does not establish a permit issue date, construction start, completion, in-service status, capacity, or commercial award.

Texas T-4 pipeline permit searches usually start with a permit number, an operator name, or a county.

The EnergyNetWatch watchlist is built for the next step: turning the current Railroad Commission of Texas T-4 new-permit list into a recurring infrastructure signal that can be reviewed by operator, county, commodity, classification, source date, and route-evidence status.

The watchlist does not treat a T-4 permit as proof of construction, in-service status, capacity, economics, or counterparty exposure. It treats the record as a source-backed pipeline infrastructure lead that may deserve follow-up.

That distinction is important. A Texas drilling permit points to planned well activity. A Texas T-4 permit points to pipeline infrastructure context. For midstream, service, commercial, land, analyst, and data users, the next step is checking whether the row has enough operator, county, commodity, source-date, and route context to support follow-up.

Current Verified T-4 Signal

EnergyNetWatch checked the RRC new-permits page and its linked 2026 PDF on August 31, 2026. The current statewide PDF is dated August 21, 2026. The separate county GIS review below was refreshed July 27, 2026.

Current signalVerified value
Unique T-4 identifiers in the August 21 statewide PDF60
Gas / liquid identifiers47 / 13
Highest identifier listed10798
County mentions across listed identifiers101 across 73 named counties
Latest statewide PDF source clockAugust 21, 2026
Latest EnergyNetWatch county GIS refreshJuly 27, 2026
Counties in that GIS refreshAustin, Chambers, Lee, Reeves, and Upton

The statewide PDF keeps the permit-list baseline current through its August 21 source clock. It contains 61 physical data rows but 60 unique identifiers because permit 10744 appears twice with the same source fields. The PDF does not include a per-row issue-date field, so the 60-identifier count is a deduplicated source-list snapshot rather than a count of permits issued on one known day.

What Changed Since The July 9 Baseline

The July 9 RRC PDF listed 51 unique identifiers, including 40 gas and 11 liquid records, with a highest identifier of 10789. The August 21 PDF lists 60 unique identifiers, including 47 gas and 13 liquid records, with a highest identifier of 10798.

The change is nine additional unique identifiers in the statewide list: seven gas identifiers and two liquid identifiers. The most frequent exact source-filed operator labels remain Marathon Pipe Line LLC and ONEOK NGL Pipeline, L.L.C. with three identifiers each. Civitas Permian Operating, LLC, Ballard Exploration Company, Inc., Pickton Gas Storage LLC, Brookston Energy, Inc., and Moriah Operating, LLC each appear twice.

Chambers is the most frequently mentioned county with four identifiers. Ward, Jefferson, Midland, Nacogdoches, and Galveston each appear three times. Those are source-list concentrations, not measures of construction progress, capacity, production, or spend.

The July 27 GIS review found eight exact identifiers above the older 10767 PDF sequence. All eight appear in the August 21 statewide PDF as well. The GIS review still matters because it supplies a separate mapped source surface; it should not be merged with the statewide PDF into one issue-date or construction claim.

July 27 Five-County GIS Review

EnergyNetWatch refreshed the RRC county pipeline GIS files for Austin, Chambers, Lee, Reeves, and Upton counties on July 27, 2026.

At the time of this comparison, the reference PDF carried an Apr. 15 source clock and ended at 10767. The current August 21 PDF is summarized above. The GIS review and statewide PDF remain separate source surfaces with separate clocks.

Review itemJuly 27 result
County GIS files successfully refreshed5
Exact T-4 identifiers above the PDF sequence8
Gas transmission records3
Gas gathering records2
Liquids / production records3
Largest RRC-recorded outside diameters28 in. and 24 in.
County GIS refreshJuly 27, 2026
Reference PDF clock used in the July 27 comparisonApr. 15, 2026
Current statewide PDF clockAugust 21, 2026
T-4Operator / systemCountyServiceRRC recorded outside diameterGIS rows
10789MAGNETAR OPERATING LLC / TURNER UNITChambersGas gathering3.5 in.1
10788ONEOK NGL PIPELINE, L.L.C. / MONT BELVIEUChambersLiquids / production segments6.63, 8.63, 10.75, 12.75 in.19
10783ONEOK NGL PIPELINE, L.L.C. / MONT BELVIEUChambersLiquids6.63, 8.63 in.2
10782ONEOK NGL PIPELINE, L.L.C. / MONT BELVIEUChambersLiquids6.63 in.1
10781AMP INTRASTATE PIPELINE, LLC / ASPEN KATY HUB GAS TRANSMISSION LINEAustinGas transmission24 in.1
10776PECOS POWER PLANT LLC / SALSBURY PECOSReevesGas transmission10.75 in.1
10771MPH BASTROP LATERAL, LLC / MPH BASTROP LATERALLeeGas transmission28 in.1
10768CGP OPERATING, LLC / BENEDUMUptonGas gathering6.63 in.1

Outside-diameter values are shown as recorded in the RRC county pipeline GIS. Multiple values mean the T-4 identifier matched mapped segments with different recorded diameters.

This is not a complete statewide delta. Current GIS presence does not establish when a permit was issued. It also does not prove construction, completion, in-service status, capacity, route ownership, project spend, procurement, or an award.

Current Statewide 2026 PDF Baseline

The separate statewide baseline uses the RRC 2026 New Pipeline Permits PDF available from the RRC new-permits page when checked on August 31, 2026.

Watchlist itemCurrent signal
Current 2026 unique T-4 identifiers60
Gas identifiers47
Liquid identifiers13
County mentions across listed identifiers101
Source clockRRC list last updated August 21, 2026
Per-row issue dates in YTD PDFNot included
Duplicate treatmentPermit 10744 counted once

EnergyNetWatch Texas T-4 watchlist source snapshot

EnergyNetWatch public T-4 watchlist snapshot from the RRC 2026 New Pipeline Permits PDF dated August 21. The graphic uses unique identifiers, counts the duplicate 10744 row once, and does not imply per-row issue dates that are not present in the YTD PDF.

The statewide list remains a source-clock baseline. County GIS refreshes can add newer route evidence, but they should not be presented as statewide permit-list movement without comparable coverage and permit issue dates.

Why A Watchlist Is Better Than A One-Off Article

The evergreen Texas RRC T-4 pipeline permit explainer answers the searcher's first question: what a Texas RRC T-4 pipeline permit is, how GIS route evidence fits, and why a source row needs context.

The watchlist answers a different question: what the current source list shows and which records deserve review.

Those are separate jobs.

The explainer should stay stable. The watchlist should change as the source changes.

That gives EnergyNetWatch a cleaner public content system:

Page typeJob
T-4 permit explainerExplain the source, search process, GIS route evidence, and workflow
T-4 watchlist hubMaintain the current baseline and archive recurring reviews
Dated T-4 source reviewHighlight the current operator, county, commodity, and classification signals
LinkedIn/X signalPull one record or trend into a short public post

This structure gives search users a stable answer and gives repeat readers a reason to come back when the source list changes.

How To Read A T-4 Signal

A T-4 signal is strongest when the source row can be tied to a specific operator, county set, commodity, classification, source clock, and route-evidence status.

T-4 fieldWhat to check next
Operator / P-5Confirm source label and account match
County listCheck concentration, nearby wells, permits, and facilities
CommoditySeparate gas, liquid, and other pipeline context
ClassificationKeep private, common carrier, and gas utility rows separate
Source clockConfirm whether the row is current enough for follow-up
Route evidenceCheck whether the row has mapped GIS context

What The Watchlist Tracks

The Texas T-4 watchlist is designed around public-record fields that can support a real business follow-up.

FieldWhy it matters
T-4 permit numberGives the record a source identifier for review and lookup
Operator or applicantSupports account screening and operator-level monitoring
P-5 numberHelps distinguish similar operator names
CommoditySeparates gas, liquid, and other pipeline context
ClassificationHelps separate private, common-carrier, gas-utility, and other record types
County listShows where the infrastructure signal is located
Source clockPrevents stale records from being presented as current activity
GIS route evidenceAdds spatial context when a route match is available

The watchlist should not flatten those fields into one generic activity number. A gas/private row in Reeves County, a common-carrier liquid row across Culberson, Loving, and Winkler, and a gas-utility row across several counties can all matter, but they do not mean the same thing.

Current County And Operator Signals

In the current August 21, 2026 public list, Chambers appears four times. Ward, Jefferson, Midland, Nacogdoches, and Galveston each appear three times. Brooks, Webb, Zapata, Crane, Liberty, Upton, Wharton, Nueces, Reeves, and several other counties each appear twice.

CountyCurrent rows
Chambers4
Ward3
Jefferson3
Midland3
Nacogdoches3
Galveston3

The operator view is distributed. Marathon Pipe Line LLC and ONEOK NGL Pipeline, L.L.C. each appear three times. Civitas Permian Operating, LLC, Ballard Exploration Company, Inc., Pickton Gas Storage LLC, Brookston Energy, Inc., and Moriah Operating, LLC each appear twice. Most other exact source-filed labels appear once.

OperatorCurrent rows
Marathon Pipe Line LLC3
ONEOK NGL Pipeline, L.L.C.3
Civitas Permian Operating, LLC2
Ballard Exploration Company, Inc.2
Pickton Gas Storage LLC2
Brookston Energy, Inc.2

This is where the watchlist becomes stronger than a static list. If a future RRC update adds new rows, EnergyNetWatch can separate the current additions from the baseline and show whether a county or operator is moving above its recent average.

Example Records Worth Reviewing

Three records in the current list show why a T-4 watchlist should be more than a count.

RecordWhy it is worth review
Enterprise Products Operating LLC in Martin and Midland countiesLarge midstream operator, gas/private classification, and Midland Basin county context
Diamondback E&P LLC in Midland CountyOperator-linked infrastructure context that can be checked alongside drilling and well activity
Plains Pipeline L.P. in Culberson, Loving, and Winkler countiesLiquid/common-carrier row across core Delaware Basin counties

None of those rows should be presented as a completed project by themselves. The next step is review: route match, permit detail, source documents, related wells, nearby drilling permits, facility records, and whether the record supports an account, project, or API workflow.

How Weekly Movement Should Be Scored

When new source snapshots are available, the watchlist should score the update with more context than a raw count.

MetricUse
This updateNumber of new or changed rows in the latest source snapshot
Rolling 90-day averageBaseline that makes the current count meaningful
Fast moversOperators with the largest increase in T-4 activity
Emerging countiesCounties moving above their recent baseline
Commodity mixGas, liquid, or other row share
Classification mixPrivate, common carrier, gas utility, or other classifications
Route evidenceWhich rows have confirmed or candidate GIS context

The page should make clear whether a source update is normal, concentrated, or worth immediate follow-up.

What The Watchlist Does Not Prove

The watchlist is intentionally conservative.

Not proven by the watchlist aloneWhy
In-service statusA listed T-4 permit row does not confirm active operation
Construction completionAdditional source review may be required
Final route certaintyGIS evidence must be matched and reviewed
Capacity or economicsT-4 permit rows do not provide a commercial valuation
Complete counterparty exposureThe public row does not identify every commercial relationship

This caveat is not a weakness. It is the difference between a public-record lead and an unsupported claim.

Request The Current T-4 Route Evidence Table

The public watchlist shows enough to validate the workflow. The full EnergyNetWatch workflow is built for users who need the table, route evidence, operator grouping, county context, exports, alerts, or API access.

View the Texas Pipeline Construction Signal Report package if your team wants the current T-4 table, route review, county/operator rollups, map context, exports, or API-ready infrastructure records.

For a smaller first request, ask for the current T-4 route-evidence sample. Include the counties, operators, or commodity types your team wants checked.

Choose The Next T-4 Workflow

The right next step depends on whether you are verifying one public record or monitoring a recurring signal.

Search or workflow intentBest next path
Verify a permit number, operator, or county recordStart with the RRC New Pipeline Permits source, then use the T-4 route-evidence explainer.
Review current T-4 rows by operator, county, commodity, or source clockUse this watchlist and its dated archive.
Monitor drilling or permit activity through a recurring API workflowReview the Texas drilling permits API and infrastructure signals API paths.
Receive a ranked infrastructure review with route context and exportsUse the Texas Pipeline Construction Signal Report or request a sample.

This keeps a one-time source lookup separate from a current watchlist, a ranked report, or a repeatable API/alert workflow.

Latest Watchlist Archive

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Texas T-4 watchlist a replacement for RRC search?

No. The RRC remains the source system. The EnergyNetWatch watchlist organizes public source records into operator, county, commodity, classification, source-clock, map, export, alert, and API workflows.

Why does the watchlist show a source clock?

The source clock prevents a public-record list from being mistaken for live operational activity. The statewide PDF linked by the RRC was last updated August 21, 2026 and checked by EnergyNetWatch on August 31. Five county GIS files were refreshed separately on July 27. Those clocks describe different source surfaces and should not be combined into a false statewide update.

Can this be updated weekly?

Yes, when the RRC source page or related source records update. The first watchlist establishes the baseline. Future updates can compare new snapshots against the prior snapshot and rolling averages.

Does a T-4 permit mean a pipeline is operating?

No. A T-4 row is a pipeline permit record. It may support an infrastructure lead or route-evidence review, but it does not by itself prove in-service status, construction completion, economics, or final project scope.

Sources

Data notes

EnergyNetWatch checked the official RRC 2026 New Pipeline Permits PDF on August 31, 2026; its footer says it was last updated August 21, 2026. The PDF contains 61 physical rows and 60 unique identifiers after permit 10744 is counted once: 47 gas identifiers, 13 liquid identifiers, and a highest listed identifier of 10798. It does not include per-row issue dates. EnergyNetWatch separately refreshed Austin, Chambers, Lee, Reeves, and Upton county pipeline GIS files on July 27, 2026 and found eight exact identifiers above the older 10767 sequence. This is a five-county GIS review, not a complete statewide GIS delta, and GIS presence does not establish a permit issue date.

Recommended next pages

Related EnergyNetWatch pages

state-datapermitsinfrastructure

Query the current records with an API key

Start with $50 in prepaid API credits and create the key yourself. Use request access only when the job needs a custom report, delivery scope, or team agreement.