Insights
Data Methodology2026-06-257 min read

Texas PS-48 Pipeline Construction Signals: June 2026 Source Review

June 2026 Texas PS-48 source review with 144 construction-notice rows, 1,348.4 reported miles, timing windows, product mix, operator concentration, county concentration, and T-4 status.

By Johnathan · Reviewed by EnergyNetWatch Research · Last updated 2026-06-25

Key Takeaways

  • The current timing window has 22 rows inside 0-30 days, 6 inside 31-60 days, and 2 inside 61-90 days.
  • Natural gas gathering is the largest product category with 73 rows, followed by natural gas transmission with 31 rows and hazardous liquid transmission with 22 rows.
  • Midland, Galveston, Harrison, Glasscock, Loving, and Reeves carry the clearest county concentration in the reviewed packet.

EnergyNetWatch reviewed the current Texas PS-48 construction signal packet on June 25, 2026.

The current packet has 144 source rows, 1,348.4 reported miles, 55 unique operator names, and 85 rows with a reported T-4 number.

Thirty rows show stated construction starts inside roughly 90 days.

That does not prove the projects are active in the field. It does give teams a source-backed list to check against T-4, route, county, facility, interconnect, plant, meter station, compressor station, upstream activity, and current-status evidence.

Source Snapshot

MetricJune 2026 source signal
PS-48 source rows144
Reported miles1,348.4
Unique operator names55
Rows with T-4 numbers85
Rows without a resolved T-4 number59
Starts inside 0-30 days22
Starts inside 31-60 days6
Starts inside 61-90 days2

EnergyNetWatch Texas PS-48 construction signal snapshot

Timing Windows

Timing windowRowsHow to use it
Started / validate status112Check whether the stated start is stale, revised, complete, or still relevant.
0-30 days22Current project-file candidates if the operator, county, and T-4 context are specific enough.
31-60 days6Near-term review list for account planning and related-record checks.
61-90 days2Smaller set, but still useful where diameter, mileage, or operator context is strong.
91-180 days2Watchlist rows unless other evidence raises priority.

The timing window is not a construction-status claim. It is a triage field.

Ranked Project Signals

RankOperatorProjectProductMilesStart window
1Energy Transfer CompanyHugh Brinson 42inNatural gas transmission325.0Started / validate status
2WWM Operating, LLCDBR ExpansionNatural gas transmission53.50-30 days
3WWM Operating, LLCChevron Power LateralNatural gas transmission22.20-30 days
4WWM Operating, LLCTraverse PipelineNatural gas transmission152.1Started / validate status
5Buffalo Run Pipeline LLCLGD-C Blending To PembrookNatural gas transmission30.061-90 days
6Brazos Midland Gas, LLCSundance To Butler HP 24-InNatural gas gathering46.00-30 days
7Marathon Pipe Line LLCSweeny To Texas CityHazardous liquid transmission64.30-30 days
8Bull Run Pipeline LLCDPM-C1 - Yeti LateralNatural gas transmission1.70-30 days

The ranking is a review order. It is not a claim that the first row is the largest commercial opportunity.

The larger transmission rows need corridor, route, interconnect, compression, meter, controls, SCADA, and current-status checks.

The short lateral rows need a different review: nearby asset, customer, plant, pad, operator, or tie-in context.

Product Mix

Product typeRows
Natural gas gathering73
Natural gas transmission31
Hazardous liquid transmission22
Natural gas distribution15
Hazardous liquid gathering3

Natural gas gathering carries the largest row count. Transmission rows still matter because diameter, mileage, and route/system context can make a smaller count more important.

T-4 Status

T-4 statusRowsWhat to check
Reported T-4 number85Use the number as a route/system handle for RRC and GIS review.
Placeholder or unresolved source value31Watch for a later resolved permit number or manual source follow-up.
Distribution system/no T-4 required15Interpret separately from route-permit rows.
Not yet permitted or added to existing permit13Use operator, project, counties, product type, and source document until T-4 context is available.

This split matters. A row with a T-4 number is easier to connect to route/system context than a row that only has a project name and county list.

County Concentration

CountyPS-48 mentions
Midland17
Galveston12
Harrison11
Glasscock9
Loving9
Reeves9
Upton7
Martin5
Pecos5
Reagan5
Ward5
Culberson4

Midland leads the current county mention count. Galveston and Harrison also show enough concentration to support a project review, especially where product type and operator labels are specific.

Operator Concentration

OperatorPS-48 rows
Energy Transfer Company12
Marathon Pipe Line LLC12
SiEnergy Gas, LLC8
Brazos Midland Gas, LLC7
Atmos Pipeline - Texas5
Delaware Basin Midstream LLC5
EOG Resources, Inc.5
Sabine Oil & Gas Corporation5
Coterra Energy Operating Co.4
DCP Operating Company, LP4
Enterprise Products Operating LLC4
Midcoast Pipelines (E TX) L.P.4

Operator count alone is not enough. The next check is whether the rows have useful timing, mileage, diameter, county, T-4, or facility context.

Records To Check First

RecordWhy it deserves review
Energy Transfer Company: Hugh Brinson 42inA 325-mile, 42-inch natural gas transmission row across a multi-county corridor needs route, interconnect, and current-status review.
WWM Operating, LLC: DBR ExpansionA 53.5-mile, 42-inch expansion row with a stated July 2026 start and T-4 context.
WWM Operating, LLC: Chevron Power LateralA 36-inch lateral with power-related naming; check load-serving, plant, meter, and customer context before outreach.
Marathon Pipe Line LLC: Sweeny To Texas CityA hazardous-liquid transmission row with no resolved T-4 number in the source row; start with project name, counties, terminals, pump stations, and source follow-up.
Brazos Midland Gas, LLC: Sundance To Butler HP 24-InA 46-mile gathering row across Martin and Midland with near-term timing and T-4 context.

What The Source Supports

The PS-48 source supports a construction-notice signal.

It can support a project review order.

It can support operator, county, product, timing, mileage, diameter, and T-4 follow-up.

It does not support claims about spend, contract awards, field progress, in-service status, or final route geometry without additional evidence.

What To Ask For

Ask for the current PS-48 project signal report if your team wants:

  • the ranked project list
  • the companion CSV
  • timing-window filters
  • T-4 status and permit-number fields
  • county and operator rollups
  • product and diameter filters
  • app workspace review
  • export, alert, and API-ready fields

Request the current Texas PS-48 project signal report, companion CSV, and app workspace.

Sources

Data notes

EnergyNetWatch reviewed the current Texas RRC PS-48 new construction signal packet and companion project-signal CSV on June 25, 2026. Timing windows are based on stated construction start dates in the reviewed source packet and should be treated as triage fields until current status is verified. PS-48 rows are construction notices, not proof of in-service status, contract award, spend, exact route geometry, or field progress.

Recommended next pages

Related EnergyNetWatch pages

state-datapermitsinfrastructure

Want the current table behind this analysis?

Public articles use selected examples. Request access if your team needs current source refreshes, exact identifiers, maps, exports, alerts, saved workflows, or API access for this market.